Editorial Board

Meet our distinguished team of scholars and experts who guide the editorial direction of IJHLAI

Editorial Leadership

E

Dr. Emily Rodriguez

Editor-in-Chief

Stanford University

Professor of AI Ethics and Digital Humanities with over 15 years of experience in interdisciplinary research.

J

Prof. James Wilson

Associate Editor

Harvard Law School

Legal Technology expert specializing in AI applications in legal practice and computational legal analysis.

L

Dr. Lisa Thompson

Managing Editor

MIT AI Lab

Research scientist focusing on human-AI interaction and the social implications of artificial intelligence.

R

Prof. Robert Kim

Review Editor

Oxford University

Digital Humanities scholar with expertise in computational methods for cultural and literary analysis.

Associate Editors

S

Dr. Sarah Chen

AI Ethics

University of California, Berkeley

M

Prof. Michael Davis

Legal Technology

Yale Law School

A

Dr. Ahmed Hassan

Digital Humanities

University of Toronto

J

Prof. Jennifer Liu

Computational Linguistics

Carnegie Mellon University

D

Dr. David Park

AI Governance

Georgetown University

R

Prof. Rachel Green

Human-AI Interaction

University of Washington

Editorial Advisory Board

A

Prof. Anna Schmidt

Max Planck Institute

B

Dr. Benjamin Lee

Seoul National University

C

Prof. Carlos Mendez

University of Barcelona

F

Dr. Fatima Al-Zahra

King Saud University

G

Prof. George Taylor

University of Edinburgh

H

Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka

University of Tokyo

I

Prof. Isabella Rossi

University of Milan

K

Dr. Klaus Weber

Technical University of Munich

Editorial Process

1

Initial Review

The Editor-in-Chief conducts an initial assessment of submitted manuscripts to ensure they meet basic requirements and align with the journal's scope. This includes checking for originality, relevance, and adherence to submission guidelines.

2

Editor Assignment

Manuscripts are assigned to appropriate Associate Editors based on their expertise and the paper's subject matter. The assigned editor manages the peer review process and makes editorial decisions.

3

Peer Review

The assigned editor selects qualified reviewers and manages the double-blind peer review process. Reviewers provide detailed feedback on methodology, originality, significance, and presentation quality.

4

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer feedback and their own assessment, the assigned editor makes a recommendation (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject) to the Editor-in-Chief, who makes the final decision.

Editorial Policies

Ethics and Integrity

  • • Adherence to COPE guidelines
  • • Zero tolerance for plagiarism
  • • Transparent conflict of interest disclosure
  • • Fair and unbiased editorial decisions
  • • Confidentiality of review process

Review Standards

  • • Double-blind peer review process
  • • Minimum two independent reviewers
  • • Constructive and professional feedback
  • • Timely review completion (4-6 weeks)
  • • Quality assurance at all levels

Join Our Editorial Team

We welcome applications from qualified scholars interested in contributing to our editorial mission.